U.S. Government Gets It Wrong on Critical Software IP Case (Again)
The U.S. Government has reiterated a legal stance that software developers can use copyright law to prevent competitors from developing […]
Disruptive Competition Project
655 15th St., NW
Suite 410
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 783-0070
Fax: (202) 783-0534
Section
Intellectual Property
The U.S. Government has reiterated a legal stance that software developers can use copyright law to prevent competitors from developing […]
Upon the sad news of the passing of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, DisCo is republishing a 2010 column […]
Firms commonly obtain patents and take legal action against alleged patent infringers as a means to limit competition to their […]
Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Iancu v. Brunetti clearly indicates that Senator Hawley’s “Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act” (“the […]
The Supreme Court acted on a number of different intellectual property cases today, deciding one, agreeing to hear two more, […]
Last week, three major technology associations¹ joined four leading public interest groups² in an amicus brief arguing against an expansive […]
Professor Mark P. McKenna is the John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame where […]
Today the Supreme Court again invited the Solicitor General (SG) to file a brief in the long-running copyright litigation between […]
This week Google filed its reply brief, responding to arguments made in Oracle’s opposition brief, which was filed two weeks ago.
Modern competition enforcers should address a fundamental question: “whether a given use of an IP right is helping to further competition or is undermining it.”