• Home
  • About DisCo
  • Topics
    • Competition
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy
    • Information Flow
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us

Disruptive Competition Project

Breaking News on Breaking Stuff

Fair Use: The Foundation of Jon Stewart’s Success

by Jonathan Band on February 13, 2015

Jon Stewart’s announcement on February 10 that he will be retiring from The Daily Show later this year has been met with tributes to his comic genius and his impact on political discourse. But these tributes have overlooked the legal doctrine that has enabled Stewart to be so effective: fair use. (This is my second post this week about the importance of fair use to popular culture; on Tuesday I wrote about how the Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy was first written as fair use-dependent fan fiction based on the Twilight vampire series.)

Stewart’s most powerful critiques result from his juxtaposing clips of politicians and commentators on news broadcasts to demonstrate their hypocrisy. He’ll contrast a clip of a Fox News commentator expressing outrage at President Obama taking a particular action with a clip of the same commentator praising President Bush for taking a similar same action. Stewart also uses montages of clips from CNN and other news networks to demonstrate their simultaneously sensationalistic and superficial coverage of disasters and trials. But for fair use, Stewart’s rebroadcast of these clips would be willful copyright infringement, subject to statutory damages of up to $150,000 per clip.

Jon Stewart’s heavy use of clips for the purpose of humorous political criticism has inspired other comedians to emulate him, most notably his former “correspondents” Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report and John Oliver on Last Week Tonight. Stewart’s reliance on clips no doubt has also encouraged the growth of the remix culture online, where individuals combine clips of preexisting works for the purpose of political or artistic expression.

Stewart’s reliance on fair use likely made him progressive on other copyright matters. He supported fans distributing excerpts of The Daily Show online, he questioned the position of Viacom (the owner of Comedy Central, the channel that carries The Daily Show) in its litigation with YouTube, and he opposed SOPA.

Additionally, Jon Stewart’s fair use of clips has had a positive impact on policymakers. The Daily Show is perhaps the easiest example to give lawmakers and their staffs of the importance of fair use. A reference to The Daily Show makes them instantly understand how fair use functions, in Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s words, as one of the copyright law’s built-in accommodations to the First Amendment. Further, The Daily Show demonstrates clearly that large media companies (e.g., Viacom) rely on fair use.

Jon Stewart has not announced what he will do after he leaves The Daily Show. But it is hard to imagine that the greatest practitioner of fair use in this generation will not at some point embark on another venture that employs fair use.

Tagged as: Copyright, Daily Show, Fair Use, First Amendment, SOPA, Viacom

About DisCo

The Disruptive Competition Project (DisCo) is a project to promote disruptive innovation and competition to policymakers. DisCo brings together experts to explain how disruptive change in the modern economy promotes growth and advances our society.
Follow @DisCo_Project
MORE »

Contributors

  • Matt Schruers
    VP-Law & Policy @ CCIA; Adjunct Prof @ Georgetown; IP nerd.
    Follow @MSchruers
    MORE »
  • Ali Sternburg
    Senior Policy Counsel @ CCIA. Tweets for @DisCo_Project. singer/songwriter/lawyer.
    Follow @alisternburg
    MORE »
  • Marianela López-Galdos
    Director of Competition & Regulatory Policy @CCIA. Competition Policy in DC, Brussels & around the globe. Passport/Plane/Go!
    Follow @MLopezGaldos
    MORE »
  • Bijan Madhani
    Senior Policy Counsel @ CCIA. Likes talking about data, but not yours. Can't carry a tune.
    Follow @bijanm
    MORE »
  • Isabelle Styslinger
    Research Analyst @ CCIA. Catch me at @DisCo_Project. Let Bartlet Be Barlet
    Follow @i_styslinger
    MORE »
  • Rachael Stelly
    Embracing the geek within re: tech, trade policy @ccianet and mostly retweeting Star Wars takes on U.S. politics
    Follow @Rachael_Stelly
    MORE »
  • Jonathan Band
    Runs policybandwidth, a one-man IP policy band.
    Follow @BandJonathan
    MORE »
  • Glenn Manishin
    Managing Partner, ParadigmShift Law & Senior Legal Analyst @ DisCo. Long time technology lawyer and competition policy advisor. Inveterate blogger and Formula One motor racing enthusiast.
    Follow @glennm
    MORE »
  • Christian Borggreen
    Vice President & Head Of Office, @CCIAEurope. Currently on travel or planning next trip.
    Follow @Borggreen
    MORE »
  • Jakob Kucharczyk
    Vice President, Competition & EU Regulatory Policy @ CCIA Brussels. Covers e-commerce, IP, telecoms and competition. Football player and coach (i.e. soccer).
    Follow @CCIAEurope
    MORE »
  • Maud Sacquet
    Public Policy Manager @CCIA Europe. Covers audiovisual & copyright. Unapologetic bookworm.
    Follow @MaudSacquet
    MORE »
  • Frances Robinson
    Freelance Journalist, ex-Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg. Covers EU technology and telecoms, food and drink, and the Eurovision Song Contest.
    Follow @FMR_Brussels
    MORE »

Featured Post

ANTITRUST IN 60 SECONDS: DOES SIZE MATTER IN COMPETITION POLICY?
Recent commentary on competition law and policy might lead one to believe that size is all that matters in the competition policy sphere: big is bad; small is beautiful. However, an assessment of the evolution of modern competition law enforcement shows that size is just one element of a broader and more sophisticated analysis.
READ MORE »

Tweets by @DisCo_Project
Powered by CCIA

Copyright © 2012 - 2018

MENU
  • Home
  • About DisCo
  • Topics
    • Competition
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy
    • Information Flow
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us