ICYMI: Expert Panel Concerned Upcoming Supreme Court Decision Could Harm Internet Users, Free Expression, and Digital Economy
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is widely regarded as “the most important law in tech.” Within […]
Disruptive Competition Project
655 15th St., NW
Suite 410
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 783-0070
Fax: (202) 783-0534
Category
Section 230
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is widely regarded as “the most important law in tech.” Within […]
In the last few months, services based on Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have spread across the […]
Without the longstanding interpretation of Section 230 as providing broad protections to digital intermediaries and their users, the digital economy, built on user interactions with an enormous variety of content, could not continue to exist.
Scores of briefs were filed last month in a closely watched Supreme Court case by parties with a stake in what has been called “the most important law in tech.”
A generation after a law that made online commentary possible, long-standing rules of the road online have become a political football.
Amid an ongoing federal conversation about digital services’ content moderation, several state policymakers are pursuing legislation on content moderation. Last […]
The Disruptive Competition Project covered a wide range of topics in 2020 but certain subjects stood out, both new issues […]
Earlier this summer, in Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga. the Supreme Court voted 6-3 in favor of an interpretation of […]
Recent Congressional legislation and hearings have touched on the meaning of “otherwise objectionable” in the provision of federal law, Section […]
As debate around Section 230 continues, Broadband Breakfast has begun hosting a series of three live lunch events titled Section […]